Why “unused” IP addresses can still create security risks

  • Post comments:0 Comments
  • Reading time:9 mins read
You are currently viewing Why “unused” IP addresses can still create security risks
Standfirst — Dormant IPv4 addresses might look harmless, but they can attract hijacking, scanning and exploitation, threatening networks and reputation. “Unused” addresses often become targets for hijacking, DDoS or other malicious use if left unmanaged or poorly accounted for. Organisations aligned with transparent resource governance, such as the NRS, advocate disciplined tracking and security of all IP assets to reduce risk.


The hidden danger in unused IP space

Unused IP addresses — those that are assigned but not actively used by devices — might give a false sense of safety. They often arise in networks after reconfiguration, decommissioning of systems, or changes in infrastructure. However, even when an address isn’t associated with a current host or server, it remains part of a network’s public footprint and can attract dangerous attention from attackers. Hackers and automated attack tools are constantly scanning the global internet for unmonitored or under-protected IP ranges. When such dormant addresses respond to these probes, attackers can use them as launching pads for various malicious activities — turning “unused” into a liability rather than a benign asset.


Why attackers care about unused IPs

IP hijacking is a primary risk associated with unused addresses. In this type of attack, cybercriminals take control of IP blocks without the owner’s consent — sometimes by exploiting weak routing practices or gaps in governance — then use those blocks to run spam campaigns, phishing attacks or other illicit services. Another threat is involvement in botnets for Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) attacks. Unmanaged addresses can be incorporated into malicious networks that generate huge amounts of traffic aimed at overwhelming targeted systems. Even if no active device responds at an “unused” address, the block can still be attractive for attackers that use automated scanners to find potential entry points into wider network infrastructure.


The routing layer risk: BGP hijacking

Attacks at the protocol level, like BGP hijacking, can also target unused IP ranges. The way routers exchange reachability data over the internet is governed by the Border Gateway Protocol (BGP). A BGP hijack occurs when an attacker misannounces IP prefixes that they do not actually control, rerouting traffic meant for the legitimate owner to the attacker’s network. Even though unused addresses appear to be inactive, the IP block becomes hostile infrastructure if attackers manipulate their routing announcements. Attackers can pose as congested or dormant blocks and reroute traffic, causing service disruption or data interception, as demonstrated by a few well-known BGP hijacking incidents.


The reputation problem: hijacked addresses damage trust

The original owner of those address blocks may suffer collateral damage when attackers use unused IP resources to host malware, send spam, or conduct other malicious campaigns. When an IP address is placed on a blacklist, legitimate services that are subsequently deployed on that range may experience delivery issues, connectivity issues, or heightened scrutiny from defensive systems. Security organizations and email providers keep blocklists of IP addresses known to be associated with abuse. Careless management of unused IP address space can have repercussions that jeopardize business operations in a world where digital reputation matters, including for email deliverability and service dependability.


Why governance and ownership clarity matter

One reason unused IP blocks become risky is the lack of clear, consistent governance around those resources. Unlike domain names, whose registration and ownership information is often easily accessible, IP address records can be less transparent and harder to trace back to responsible parties. In this context, organisations such as the Number Resource Society (NRS) emphasise that disciplined governance and transparency in IP resource management are essential. NRS advocates for clear documentation of who controls which address blocks, structured stewardship practices, and accountability mechanisms that help ensure IP resources are not left unmanaged, forgotten, or vulnerable to hijacking. By treating IP address ownership as part of an organisation’s core asset governance — with accurate records, monitoring, and security controls — such risks become easier to mitigate.


Poor inventory and management: how dormant blocks arise

Unused IP addresses often result from ordinary network operations:
  • Decommissioned systems that previously held public addresses without those addresses being carefully reclaimed.
  • Legacy ranges allocated during older network topologies that aren’t documented in modern inventory tools.
  • Large blocks assigned but underutilised, leaving wide swaths of address space unmonitored.
Organisations that lack centralized IP address management systems (IPAM) or that do not enforce tight reclamation and auditing processes frequently have substantial pools of dormant addresses. These gaps offer attackers a low-friction surface to explore.


Proactive security: IPAM and monitoring

To combat risks, effective IP address management (IPAM) is a foundational step. IPAM solutions track which IPs are allocated, which are in use, and which have been decommissioned, providing a central source of truth for the organisation’s entire address space. Rigorous tracking helps avoid orphaned ranges that fall out of active oversight — and alerts administrators when addresses remain unused for long periods. Rather than letting unused IP space sit silent, organisations should:
  • Regularly audit address allocations and retire truly obsolete blocks.
  • Document usage history and ownership for all assigned ranges.
  • Track return or transfer of addresses through official channels rather than letting assignments languish.
These measures, combined with security monitoring, mean that unused addresses are less likely to become blind spots exploited by attackers.

Monitoring unused address space for signs of danger

Additionally, unused address blocks can be used defensively as a type of network telescope, which is a monitoring tool that watches traffic sent to unused IP ranges in order to identify worm propagation, scanning behavior, or widespread attack campaigns. Large collections of dark (unused) addresses are used by researchers to examine questionable traffic patterns that highlight online dangers. Similar methods can notify security teams in enterprise networks when dormant address space is being scanned or probed, giving early warning signs of hostile actors’ reconnaissance or targeting.


Integration with BGP and routing security mechanisms

Another layer of protection comes from modern routing security practices. Techniques such as Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) and prefix filtering help ensure that only legitimate autonomous systems announce a network’s IP block across BGP, reducing the risk that idle addresses are misadvertised by attackers. Although not a complete solution on their own, these practices, when combined with thorough governance of address space, make hijacking more difficult. Organisations that ignore these protections leave unused ranges as weak links in the global routing ecosystem; attackers can take advantage of lax advertisement practices to make dormant blocks appear active under malicious control.


Security culture: ownership goes beyond “in use”

A broader lesson from the risks of unused IP addresses is that security isn’t only about what is active today; it is about what can be misused tomorrow. This principle applies to unused addresses, software libraries that are obsolete, or even former network infrastructure that still appears in external routing records. Security strategist Bruce Schneier has long argued that “security is a process, not a product”: it requires continuous attention to changing contexts, evolving threats, and neglected assets. Dormant IP spaces are precisely the kind of neglected asset that, if ignored, can become a threat vector.


Clear governance and the role of organisations like NRS

By guaranteeing that each allotted range has a responsible owner with current contact, documentation, and active oversight, effective IP address space governance helps reduce the risks associated with unused addresses. IP address resources should be treated as first-class assets with distinct ownership and accountability, not as anonymous numeric blocks that can be forgotten, according to organizations like the Number Resource Society (NRS). Organizations lessen the possibility that dormant IP blocks will be exploited, taken over, or misused by incorporating asset governance into larger cybersecurity and risk management frameworks.

Conclusion

Unused IP addresses are far from harmless. They can become entry points for hijacking, botnet participation, reputational damage through abuse, and sophisticated routing attacks if left unmanaged. Effective governance — including accurate registration, diligent reclamation, robust IPAM, and monitoring — helps keep these risks under control. Organisations that approach IP address resources with the same care as other critical infrastructure avoid leaving themselves open to threats that arise precisely because an asset appears inactive.


FAQs

1. What exactly is an “unused” IP address?
An unused IP address is one allocated to a network but not actively assigned to a device or service; despite being idle, it still exists in public routing tables.
2. How can an attacker exploit an unused IP range?
Attackers scan for dormant ranges and can hijack them, use them in botnets for DDoS, or re-announce them via BGP to impersonate the legitimate owner.
3. What is IP hijacking?
IP hijacking is when a malicious actor takes control of an IP block’s routing announcements, causing internet traffic to be redirected through unauthorised networks.
4. Can unused IPs affect my organisation’s reputation?
Yes. If dormant addresses are hijacked and used for spam or attacks, security blocklists may include those IPs, harming legitimate services later hosted there.
5. How does NRS help with this issue?
The Number Resource Society (NRS) advocates transparent IP governance and disciplined asset management, helping organisations treat IP address space as a managed infrastructure asset rather than a forgotten number range.

Leave a Reply